I’ve got a couple of pics from the change ringers from St. Mary’s of Rawmarsh to share. There were tight quarters in the room, so I wasn’t able to get a picture with everyone at once. Those blurred ropes mean lots of movement! The whole tower gently shook as they rang the bells. They were a wonderful group of people. Very friendly and obviously in love with bell ringing. They also gently chided me for not being able to ring changes. I’ll get there, someday!
You’ve heard about the rare occurrence of planets lining up in the sky? There is a bell equivalent, which I’ll call “bell alignment,” in which you can hear two different sets of bells in a row from the same listening spot! And this Sunday, we will have the rare chance to hear a ring and a carillon–a truly fortuitous bell alignment–on the University of Chicago campus.
That star on the University of Chicago campus is the place to go on Sunday, September 29th. From noon-1 pm, you’ll hear a group of friends from the UK change ringing from Mitchell Tower (the diamond at 57th and University). From 1-2 pm, you’ll hear Joey Brink perform on the carillon at Rockefeller Memorial Chapel (the lower diamond). Please go for me and report back, since I can’t make it! Later, this same group will continue on to St. Paul’s of Riverside, a Chicago suburb, to ring their bells at 3 pm.
On Saturday, September 28th, yet another change ringing group from the UK, this one from St. Mary’s in Rawmarsh, near Sheffield, will be performing on the ring in Mitchell Tower from 10:30 am to 1 pm. I plan on listening and watching, and I’ll share some pics afterwards.
Today’s Youth Climate Change Strike has captured the attention of the world, as well it should! My support goes out to them for real transformation at the national and global level to mitigate the environmental catastrophe awaiting us. And I’m pleased that faith communities from Cape Cod in Massachusetts will ring out their support of the strike. At 11 a.m. this morning, twelve faith communities will ring their bells.
Perhaps, in ringing for this event, the bells serve more as an alarm. In medieval Europe, that’s certainly one of their functions—to alarm the populace of an invading army or fire. Ringing bells for today’s event resonates with Greta Thunberg’s urging to “panic like the house is on fire.” And in Colorado, another bell ringer has been ringing a bell outside the state capitol to raise the alarm on climate change. Mary Beth Downing has been doing this the 11th hour or the 11th day of every month since last December.
Just another instance in which bells are connected to our history and made relevant today.
It’s early (or late) to talk about Independence Day, but think of this as your hint of what’s coming up next year.
On July 4, 1776, our first VP John Adams announced that our nation’s independence should be celebrated with the ringing of bells. For decades afterwards, bells were a source of celebratory sound on Independence Day in the young United States of America. Fireworks too enhanced the celebration from the beginning, but while they persist in today’s patriotic displays, the ringing of bells on the 4th of July has dwindled.
It is a lost opportunity, though, to leave silent our potent symbols of liberty on Independence Day. Advocates have tried to bring back the tradition. Eric Sloane’s and Eric Hatch’s efforts convinced President John F. Kennedy to command the ringing of bells on the 4th of July in 1963 and beyond—“Let’s Ring Freedom Bells!” Carmella LaSpada, who worked as a White House aid from 1962 to 1971 and founded the No Greater Love Foundation, has also rallied for a renewal of this tradition. Progress has been sporadic on this front. There is no nationwide tradition of bell ringing—yet.
The City of Bells organization in the Twin Cities of Minnesota successfully united their communities to ring bells for Independence Day in 2019. And now, Rebecca Jorgenson Sundquist, their leader, wants to scale up to bring back this tradition nationwide. I’ll be helping them—and I’m thrilled to do so!—as well as other bell organizations across the country. We’ll be using our marketing and PR might to bring back this lost custom so fitting for our country that values liberty.
The fourth main value of bells I perceive is their connection to histories. The first history I mean is the particular history of Western Europe. Today we are familiar with one main use of tower bells that dates to the middle ages—to signal to faithful Christians. For example, tower bells would signal when to pray the Angelus, when to come to church for Mass, and when the bread was transubstantiating into the host. Church bells frequently still signal the beginning of a church service. Bells in Western Europe during the middle ages were also critical signalers for secular affairs, which is perhaps lesser known today. They would sound the alarm of advancing armies or fire and announce the opening of markets or nightly curfew. The sound of bells regulated the workings of a city from dawn to dusk. Bells were upheld as symbols in another crucial history in the USA—the fight for freedom stretching from abolitionism to the civil rights movement. Abolitionists used the Liberty Bell as a symbol for their movement to free slaves. A century later, Martin Luther King Jr. described bells ringing for freedom in his civil rights speeches.
Bells remind us of these histories, and in doing so, remind us in turn of their values. Today, I think tower bells in North America are primarily associated with churches and are heard as messengers of the faith. The future of bells here, I think, lie in their power to reclaim their association to more secular values. While we no longer need bells to regulate our day, the sound of bells can serve as advocates for community values—collaboration, orderliness, and promoting the common welfare—and our American value of freedom.
I have already touched on the third value of bells for us today—as public sound art. The sounds of tower bells are the aural equivalent to the visual arts on display in public. As public visual arts provide an aesthetic experience for the entire community, so the same goes for the sounds, and in particular the music, of bells. The shared aesthetic experience can serve as a touchstone for the community.
The sounds of bells can define the communal boundaries, just like streets or other landmarks serve as visual, physical boundaries for a neighborhood. Chicago itself has a wonderful example of this—it is said that if you can hear the bells of St. Michael, then you are in the neighborhood of Old Town. The bells figure prominently in the community’s conception of itself.
There is a pronounced drawback with bell ringing regularly floating out over a community. That is, some listeners won’t appreciate them and will rally to stop them. Of course, the same fate can happen to public art perceived as an eyesore. That is the trick with tower bells today, especially with the waning influence of churches—negotiating the use of bells so as to fit within the community.
R. Murray Schafer (no relation) coined the term soundmark, meaning a sound unique to an area, analogous to a landmark. Taking it a step further, Schafer argued that soundmarks should be preserved, since they define the acoustics of the surrounding community. And I agree! Tower bells fit this description. Bells are not so ubiquitous (at least in the US) as to be ordinary. Furthermore, if you listen carefully, you can hear the timbral and tonal differences in sets of bells, which lend themselves to providing a unique aural stamp on a location.
When community members or frequent visitors hear bells from a particular location, they begin to associate that place with that sound. The bell sound helps ground us in that particular place, and perhaps even a particular time. How many people associate the sound of bells with their church or Sunday morning? Or the same sound with their college campus and carefree student days? (That second association is potent—I wrote a dissertation exploring it.)
The pleasant sound of bells wafting through the air can provide a brief mental escape for listeners—passersby may hear a favorite song played on the carillon and think back to a fond memory—but at the same time the sound reminds them of their current particular place and time at that moment. A bit of a paradox, but I think the escape/grounding dichotomy is not mutually exclusive; I think both can operate together at some level
For the next few days, I’ll post on the most important reasons for bells in our current time. I look forward to your responses in the comments!
One reason I think tower bells are important today is the occasion they provide for serendipitous beauty. A passerby is walking along, minding her own business, when she suddenly hears a bell (or two, or three, or many) and recognizes it as a beautiful sound—perhaps even as music. It is an unexpected moment of beauty in her day. So many of our aesthetic experiences are curated to us as a discreet entities; I find it endearing to still have artistry interwoven with our daily life. These experiences can also trigger awe and its accompanying effects, as described in an earlier post.
In this respect, tower bells function similarly to public art works. Sculptures, murals, and other outdoor visual arts are meant to provide an aesthetic experience for the passers-by in a public setting. Tower bells are the aural analogue. And how many other aural analogues can you think of? Perhaps music piped onto the sidewalk outside of stores? There are not too many instances of pleasant sounds, let alone music, being performed in public for the enjoyment of an incidental audience.
I personally love the serendipitous moment of beauty that catches me unawares. That’s the stuff I live for! And that will bring me to my next post on the second reason tower bells are important—their function as a soundmark.
Now that we’ve had a few days to examine the dress, the flowers, the fascinators, etc. of the royal wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, let’s take a listen to their exit out of St. George’s Chapel in Windsor.
I hear the guard announcing the couple, people cheering, a woman(?) screaming (really not sure if that’s a person or some kind of noise maker), a choir singing…and…wait…there’s NO BELLS. Yes, that’s right. NO BELLS. What are a beautiful ring of bells for if not to ring for a royal wedding? The bells of St. George’s Chapel rang for the recent birth of Prince Louis Arthur Charles, so…why exactly were they not rung for this occasion? Hmm. Somebody doesn’t like bells. Not a friend of mine.
I’m huffy right now, but I’ll get over it. Here’s a link to hear what the bells could have sounded like for our gleaming married couple.
Update: there were bells! They rang during the carriage procession, and you can hear them faintly in the video below. Whew! Thanks, Matthew Higby, for correcting me.
Friends, we have two bell festivals, one on change ringing and one on the carillon, coming up here in the month of May.
First, the 6th Annual Illinois Tower Bell Bash will take place May 19-20. Ringers will gather to ring changes (what else?) at the Mitchell Tower at the University of Chicago on Saturday and at St. Paul’s, Riverside on Sunday. Saturday’s ringing will have the silencer on, but if you ask Tom Farthing very nicely, he may allow you to watch the ringers in person, maybe even try it out! On Sunday the bells will ring out for everyone to hear. More details and contact information on the North American Guild of Change Ringers webpage.
Second, the Rockefeller Carillon New Music Festival will take place May 25-26. Carillonneurs from here and abroad will premiere sixteen compositions, some including collaborations with electronics and other instruments. Augusta Read Thomas’ Ripple Effects for 24 hands (yikes) will premiere on Friday at 6 pm. Fill your hearts and souls with new music for the bells, even meet the performers and composers. More details on the Rockefeller webpage.
I’ll try to make both of these–see you there!